PlutonArioch Dec 10, 2022 @ 11:29pm. It doesn't measure anything. Otherwise the only ways to force and end to the war is to surrender yourself, or status quo 2 years after the opponent reached 100% war exhaustion. More seriously though and less trolly, yeah, I'm not really liking the fact that it autosurrenders without an accept/deny window like in EU4. I'm addicted to Stellaris rn, but I actively avoid going to war at all costs. When a nation in Stellaris goes to war, the players are asked to manage the fleets and the armies and that's it. Thats another problem Stellaris has had from day one, no seperate peace. The war exhaustion in this game does not work well. One of the Khan's sucessor states ought to be totally beaten, they're at 100% exhaustion, but they have one system left and I can't get to it because a neutral empire closed its boadrers to me. I'm stuck in a war, I'm not one of the leaders, and I need it to end. However I saw no way to change my war goals. War Exhaustion trigger percent: 40%. 5 (Ships are more harder to replace than troops but still they are replaceable) WAR_EXHAUSTION_ARMY_KILLED_MULT = 0. War exhaustion in Stellaris is just a mechanic to prevent foreverwars between the AI and the player exploiting the AI through war too. Everstill Colonel. Any time a ground unit is lost. Check the beta, there was a patch notes and dev diary listing the change: "100 war exhaustion no longer forces you to surrender. That’s what happens in stellaris. The status quo peace is like a compromise if u own a claimed system when a status quo happens you get said system and vice versa , u don’t usually need to bomb planets you just need to make a bigger army to take them, the status quo can be forced on you 2 years after you hit 100% war exhaustion and vice versa, in order to achieve your wargoal u need to. Can't invade the ally to try and force a surrender either since there's a 4th nation blocking you. I have the +100 War Exhaustion and +50 Relative Navy Strength. NuclearKiwix • 1 yr. CryptoThe first person to hit 100% war exhaustion can only surrender when the other party lets them do it. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. But when i do, i go full tilt. It has literally no system left to conquer. Cato, they are not the same in Stellaris either. My first legit playthrough is going very well except for one thing: war exhaustion during wars. War exhaustion is constantly added, just the amount can be changed. IN theory with a player or AI, but the AI usually asks for your surrender as soon as you hit that point. 113. We're making changes to the War Exhaustion following your feedback. My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. 414K subscribers in the Stellaris community. Occupation breeds resistance. Two years after the war exhaustion reaches 100% for either side, the other side can force the war to end in a Status Quo Peace. Systems occupied by this side will be immediately ceded, making cede_claims and release_occupied_systems_on_status_quo fields irrelevant. This is the problem with the war exhaustion system: it makes no sense. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. War Exhaustion is increased by destroying their fleets, as well as steadily over time. So you can see how you get situations like the OP where the AI fights this massive, decimating battle and seems to get no war exhaustion from it. Perhaps the solution is to remove war exhaustion for total wars completely, but leaving it for other wars. Once your war exhaustion reaches 100%, you have a two-year grace period, after which if your opponent wants peace, they can force you to accept it. Question. For the AI they will automatically accept a status quo request in this case, a human player simply doesn't get the option to refuse the request. . But ok fine. This means that if you lost 10 out 100 naval capacity worth of ships and the AI lost 20 out of 200 naval capacity. If you are at a 100% warscore, AI will always accept all your demands. If all your planets are claimed you could be in trouble lol. Once you have had 100% for 24 months you can force surrender. If you look at every historical scenario ever, losing Battle after Battle, failing to attack as the aggressor, and losing copius amounts of manpower and ships causes the aggressor to want to sue for peace, whereas when a defender actually, oh I don't know. There are no other mechanisms tied to it. Story/rant time: I declare war on an awakened empire and absolutely stomp their entire fleet, their war exhaustion shoots up to 70 while mine is only at 20. It only starts to matter if you're the attacker, both sides get to 100% and you haven't achieved all your goals yet. They. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. But in theory if not one of the empires sue for peace it could go on. That allows the attacker to force a status quo after 2 years. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. A Status Quo Peace is you get to keep whatever claimed systems. 100% war exhaustion doesn't make you surrender, it just forces status quo. It favors the defender as a way to help ward off early aggression and give newer players the ability regroup. War exhaustion is only how close your nation is close to calling it quits. Feb 24, 2018. ) It counts as points towards the enemy's willingness to surrender or accept a status quo. Status Quo can be enforced by either side as soon as 24 months have passed since the opposing side reached 100% war exhaustion, and if both sides reach 100% war exhaustion, the Status Quo is enforced automatically after 24. No one can be forced to surrender without opposing war goals being occupied. [PSA] 100% war exhaustion and Forced Status quo are not indicators of winning/losing a war. You were NOT the war leader. But still. Oh, and force you to use the total war casus belli, which, while it allows you to wage total war without the need for claims in the lategame (thank you), it also means your enemies will near never surrender, despite you NOT being a fanatical purifier or whatever, and despite the fact that surrendering would mean I WONT destroy more planets and kill. The war exhaustion is gained based on the cumulative losses sustained on a percentage basis. I 100% devastate all their worlds, THEN capture them. Nothing happens-- 10% chance. Impose Ideology is -100; Humiliate is -50; Conquer scales with the amounts of claims you have. Now the difference is, you need to claim and control with status quo, if the ennemy surrender, you get all the claim. On the other hand if your navy has equal strength you need to both have taken all systems and the enemy. irritatedBowel. Illyrien Jun 28, 2016 @ 1:19am. cap every single system, invade all…There is no actual war exhaustion in the game. Status Quo can be enforced by either side as soon as 24 months have passed since the opposing side reached 100% war exhaustion, and if both sides reach 100% war exhaustion, the Status Quo is enforced automatically after 24 months. Why does it increase equally when the other side lost more; well it could be comparatively less to their grand total. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. Most of its weight comes from occupied planets so carpet sieging planets is the best way to win a war fast. ago. This mod is in no way balanced so please use with that in mind. That would get rid of the problem of. Wasn't a total war, just subjugate. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. I am using the base game. Even in victory casualties, resource drain, and general stress accumulate into exhaustion. WAR_EXHAUSTION_SHIP_KILLED_MULT = 0. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. No you don't understand I think- the war doesn't have to end in a surrender. ) All wars except those of independence have a negative surrender acceptance, which are countered by factors such as relative navy strength (up to +50), war exhaustion (up to +100) and occupation percentage (up to +100). Over the decades, I've managed to beat them into "Inferior/Pathetic" fleet status, and claim a third of their empire. I did lose 40 capacity's worth of ships, but that's it. And when I'm trying to advance to invade planet the AI keeps spamming those infinite mercenaries fleets that force me to split my fleets in two fronts. Business, Economics, and Finance. Groud Battles: 0% (killing defensive armies doesn't matter I guess) Occupation: 24%. The only no forced status quo situation would be two genocidal empires fighting, which would make sense, once war is declared it's a battle to. Look under the war goal and it should say their current acceptance of it and why. It normally only ends than and not when only one hits it. Every planet, every outpost, not matter how remote. 0 Now 0. Okey, then this might be mod related. Before stage five, they actually don't even get a total war CB. Use a race with modifiers to war exhaustion. So I have a war going on against a faction and their ally. Thats surprising given the design goal was specifically made to account for this. This makes no sense and must be changed. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. I win every space battle. Apparently my nation is 78% towards accepting a forced status quo, while the enemy only 56%. In case nobody was following the war exhaustion thread, here's the formula the game apparently uses to decide how much war exhaustion is suffered after a space battle: 1. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…Gestalt Consciousness gives you a cool -20% to War Exhaustion. With automatic Status Quo peace, forcing attackers into Pyrrhic victories was a viable strategy to control your losses in the peace. But even with this setup, the AI does not surrender at 100%. ) If it reaches 100%, then after 2 years you can FORCE them to accept a status quo end to the war [and the same applies from them to you]. Also, any fix to alliance War Exhaustion has to ensure that the 1v1 wars are not affected. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. WTF. 100% War Exhaustion allows you to force an enemy to accept a Status Quo. Otherwise you could just declare Containment war, exhaust them, and when they surrender instantly anex everything. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). Why am I not. Novaseerblyat • Machine Intelligence • 6 mo. Judging by the numbers, it looks like they're at -200 from surrender and a vassalization wargoal and +196 from factors including 100 war exhaustion and 46 occupation. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. 100 occupation causes an automatic victory. Report. Goal was to cede one planet and vassalize remainder. The war is not over at 100% war exhaustion; it carries out for two years more before anyone can force peace. In this case, the target empire had no navy when I declared war (they lost it in an earlier war vs a Holy Guardian - hence my decision to pounce on them!), so I've just been keeping them at bay each time they "poke" at my front lines with larger and larger fleets whilst keeping their defensive-pact "allies" in a strategic stalemate (my plan is. But then you see the dreaded pop up. I am so tired of fighting a war far more intelligently than the computer and yet still losing because the war score system sucks. In my game, a revolutionary exclave just "won" its indepndence war after 56 years. Each side has a war leader. I'm a new player with 11 hours so far. If on defense you can setup defenses so that you can force it higher over time so the opposition must white peace. The only way to force surrender is to do what you have claimed to have done: Occupy everything the opposing side owns (including allies if they have any). With automatic Status Quo. So what ends up happening, is that once you take the war exhaustion to it's limit (+100), it cancels out the system penalty. Pact with managed to anger a Fallen Empire and dragged myself and my vassals into war as a result. Just set reasonable war goals and go for those. - Never surrender (-25%) Also the first tech is just a tier 2, you can get it very early:. 5 war exhaustion. Here is my take on how the. "Unfortunately I don't have a save from before I got ♥♥♥♥♥♥ by the giga empire supporting this small pos colony, I was honestly hoping that because I had 100% war exhaustion that the war would end in 2 years, like the game told me it would before, but the game continued to let the giga empire ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ me for a sold. Technically is a bug, the R5 says they've been like this for several years, and 100% war exhaustion should force a white peace after 2 years. . Peace out via status quo and prepare for the next attack in 10 years. I would rather say the opposite. War exhaustion is just a bad status quo mechanic. They were at 100% war Exhaustion I was at like 30% So lets end this war. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. War exhaustion exists solely to force an end to wars, so the losing empire can recover. . I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. The year this. Which I found strange that they didn't do the same thing for Stellaris because it only makes sense. War Exhaustion is just a clock. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. With automatic Status Quo. r/Stellaris. If I was to surrender I would be totally integrated beacuse of their ideology. They reached 100% war exhaustion after a few years, but they didn't surrender. vassailize war goal -100 War exhaustion +97. ) If it reaches 100%, then after 2 years you can FORCE them to accept a status quo end to the war [and the same applies from them to you]. The difference is in occupations. Rebels of an ally won't surrender despite now reaching 100% War Exhaustion in their rebellion war. Same issue. The last one technology is a technology that reduces your fatigue by 10% and is extremely useful. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. War exhaustion for the small empire vs the AI Federation is at 89%. l_x_fx. Mar 21, 2023Elitewrecker PT Apr 29, 2018 @ 12:48pm. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Warscore is 211 to 8. 2) War exhaustion adds a score to their acceptance rate for status quo and surrender. I am sorry to open yet another topic about this, but since it has been the tactic of the other side in this debate to spam this forum until the devs. Instead, your unity gain is reduced by 90% and your influence gain is set to 0. :) Remember we're always looking for more suggestions and constructive criticism:. In the case of a subjugation war, if you get a status quo then all the systems you fully occupy (meaning own the star base AND have successfully invaded with armies if there's a planet) wil splinter off into another new empire as your vassal. At this point I have taken roughly little over half their systems, including having landed troops and occupying the planets I control. If neither AI asks the other for peace, it can continue indefinitely. Or, at least, this has been my experience. Stellaris AAR: No Love, No Comfort. Shad May 18, 2018 @ 5:08pm. In comparison, my exhaustion totals 28%. While watching Arumba play apocalypse today he got into a war in which the AI forced him to 100% war exhaustion. Oh the auto surrender got taken out? I found that annoying because in EU4, there is no auto-surrender (there is a white-peace timeout, but that's a different mechanic) and you had to accept their demands before the surrender actually happened. You can only be forced to accept a white peace, which would have resulted in gains for you. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every system in their empire and it reduces their. If you load the attached save game, you'll see the Adeex State (rebels) have been on 100% WE for years now, but won't surrender and oddly, hasn't been defeated. 12. Excess armies are initially placed in a reserve area behind the frontline and replace any disengaged or. The more ships you have the less they contribute when dying. Unless they changed it, war exhaustion cannot force you to surrender, it can only force you to white peace. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, so that both sides are at 100%, 2 years later the war will automatically end with a status quo peace. You have the perfect start. War Exhaustion gain is done by losses as a percentage of your fleet cap. War exhaustion is not a measure of success or 'winning'. Not really. Currently, the war score is one of the mechanics feeling the most gamey in Stellaris. When I look up how our war exhaustion is determined, I find that even though I've won every ground battle, it is the single largest source of my war exhaustion. the other attacking enemy was on like 100% war exhaustion. A system where offering surrender lowered your War Exhaustion (on a time limit) and refusing enemy surrender increased it would also go a long way towards preventing the 'griefing' style of play that people were so worried about when forced peace was (thankfully) removed. Why am I not. Upon declaring victory or surrender, the victor receives a bonus to energy credits, influence, and a happiness modifier to their empire. Every other paradox game has War Score which is basically a track of who is winning and by how much. CryptoSince AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. You gain war exhaustion from time, but you gain more of it the more of your systems are occupied and the more ships you lose in battles. You'd peace out *before* you hit 100% war exhaustion in this case. So losing a battleship hurts more than losing a corvette. r/Stellaris • War exhaustion should be replaced with war taxes, happiness penalties and inner politics. If you have ten corvettes each ship lost is 10% exhaustion added for each lost, if you have 100 each corvette lost is only 1% war exhaustion. Now type surrender <crisis empire id> <war id>. • 2 yr. . I have gathered 27% exhaustion for 11 ships lost, 0% due to 5 armies lost, they have gathered 22% due to 67 ships lost, and 0% due to 141 armies lost. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, you can force a status quo peace. Ships 'destroyed' this way cause 5x war exhaustion. WTF War Exhaustion. Business, Economics, and Finance. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. He has no shipyards left - only 5 star bases, which he all built during the war. So here's what might have actually happened: 1. Menu. Of course the slowdown of the game and nerf to the ability to build big fleets over the iterations means that its. A couple of things. Your perfect start is ruined, you got the Irassians yet again. War exhaustion in the absolute best case just. Ship and army loses, occupation and technology. For some reason Stellaris does not have this system and the closest thing that can fill the void is war exhaustion. Every planet was more or less occupied. War exhaustion has two effects: 1. Pro tip: never, ever expect a surrender, never assume the other side will surrender and never surrender yourself if it loses planets. The arbitrary 2 year limit can also render allies useless, as a war can hit 100 war exhaustion and then 2 years pass before the allies can even GET to the warzone. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion. You could give one or even both empires alloys. Nothing else changes about the war. • 2 yr. 109 votes, 33 comments. 100% war exhaustion doesnt mean they will surrender, whats needed for that you can see when hoovering over the button to demand surrender. My gripes with the combat system: Even when extremely outnumbered, disengage can yield 0 losses (aka 0 War. But when they cap my war exhaustion I can be forced into surrender. Typically you don't "manage it". But thats a better place to be than where stellaris is. e. Tributary war goal. To be exact, they are forced to ACCEPT a status quo. Can someone please explain me the war exhaustion? I already played 2 games and in both, an empire declares war on me with at least 6 claims (+/-). HoI4 is explicitly a war game. Nationalistic Zeal civic gives you -10%, there are others you can take advantage of as well. All wars except those of independence have a negative surrender acceptance, which are countered by factors such as relative navy strength (up to +50),. And if, for example, the healthcare edict helped alleviate the effects of war exhaustion, that would be something. #2. They never managed to enter my space. Dec 30, 2010. They can. 01. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. No Please explain your issue is in as much detail as possible. When you get involved in a catastrophic war in stellaris, your planets and people never go up in arms or on strike. . r/Stellaris. Any time a ship is lost. Rebels of an ally won't surrender despite now reaching 100% War Exhaustion in their rebellion war. The only way they’d get systems/planets from that is if they were occupying claimed systems. And war. War Exhaustion has no effect at all outside being a counter until your opponent can force Status Quo peace, so disabling than option effectively removes the entire system. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. No, you're wrong. Otherwise you could just declare Containment war, exhaust them, and when they surrender instantly anex everything. I've won every space battle (apart from the small handful of time in which they attacked a weak outpost). Business, Economics, and Finance. If a third party is holding some of the systems you want, this means you won't be able to declare total victory, but you can at least get the claimed systems and planets. Stellaris is supposed to be a game that actually simulates running an empire, not just a game of chess in space with extra rules. Like here. Business, Economics, and Finance. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. I find. Why is my war exhaustion going up despite buffs, traditions, and not getting even close to losing. they are fully occupied. If you're "reking" your opponent to 100 exhaustion but he still doesn't want a full surrender you still have as long as it takes for you to reach 100 as well before the automatic status quo enforces to get as many more claims as you can. AI will never surrender to a total war war goal even if. It's not when they surrender. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. But no, they just give 0. that sounds like a bug, because normally if both hit the 100 % mark, the war ends. 11. So if you're willing (and able) to hold the territory and wait for them to reach 100% exhaustion you can force Status Quo, but that could take quite some time. Upon declaring victory or surrender, the victor receives a bonus to energy credits, influence, and a happiness modifier to their empire. In Stellaris it has no penalties at all. . * This mod has been developed to decrease the overall excess war exhaustion the empires experience from combat unit loss. That's how we lost the Vietnam war, too. Failed leadership resulting in War Exhaustion 100% white peace gives you big trouble in other Paradox games. Now the economy is actually compelling and diplomacy will almost receive a rework as well, that doesn't need to be the case any more. Demand all the war goals, or surrender giving over all the war goals, then type "play 00" into the console to return to. If you go to the negotiate page, try. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. Sure, an unconquered planet can also mean, that another Empire is also waging war on your target and is holding some planets, thus they do not count towards their war. Adds [district id] to the planet. You can win a war with 100% war exhaustion while your opponent is at 1%. The last one technology is a technology that reduces your fatigue by 10% and is extremely useful. The arbitrary 2 year limit can also render allies useless, as a war can hit 100 war exhaustion and then 2 years pass before the allies can even GET to the warzone. Take the outpost without a single ship lost and sit there with my fleet, ready to settle the war with my war goals achieved (the claim of this single system) -. The AI gets massive war exhaustion reduction cheats which is why when you’re fighting a xenophobic slaving empire that wants to use your colonial population as a workforce even if no fighting ever happens, you’ll reach 100% before them and probably by quite a margin at higher difficulties. When you reach 100 war exhaustion, you can't be forced to surrender unconditionally. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. Honestly the mechanic isn't exactly perfect. we got tired of his shit and decided to go to war and split him up and lock his empire into a single system. Ground combat takes place between the world owner's armies and the invader's armies. or status quo 2 years after the opponent reached 100% war exhaustion. was still negative for SQ and even more so for wargoals. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. The current stellaris war exhaustion mechanic is a terribly awful mechanic and is probably one of the least fun aspects of the game. I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. When I try to achieve war goal or status quo I get a -100 surrender and -49 relative fleet power. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. Fast forward a few more years and we took every system they had under control, and another empire declared war on them, yet they still didn't surrender. It seems you've only occupied 16% of their territory. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. ) It counts as points towards the enemy's willingness to surrender or accept a status quo. So I'm in a war with this one empire, and they won't surrender. Resulting in the common situation that even tho your fleet can destroy the enemy easily, you are forced to surrender and give up the territories you coundt reach in time. And the fact war exhaustion ticks up means that it's actually possible to put enough armies on a planet to make a literally unconquerable planet. Maraudeur. (by your opponent) And 24 months after your opponent hits 100% exhaustion, your opponent can be forced into Status Quo (by you, but that nearly never comes up because the AI always accepts at 100% itself). BUT only a status quo can be forced, not a surrender!I've noticed something in the game I'm in. The extra +100 only applies to status quo lol. To avoid that you need to win the war before that happens to you, by bringing their surrender acceptance to a level where they will surrender. There is literally no way for it to fail at that point, until the player grinds through all of the planetary invasions needed to get Occupation up to 51%. so. You just need to wait for everyone to get max war exhaustion. Business, Economics, and Finance. Both planets are heavily defended but I manage to take. It usually says why they won't capitulate. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. 75% of systems plus 75% war exhaustion would work). I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. The two are rarely entirely connected. Yeah, this happens far too often.